Comfort women discomfort
Japan is not very happy about a proposed U.S. congressional resolution asking that Tokyo apologize to “comfort women” of countries conquered by Japan’s Imperial Army who were forced to work as sex slaves during World War II.
The resolution, sponsored by several members of the U.S. House of Representatives, calls for Japan’s prime minister to “formally acknowledge, apologize and accept historical responsibility” for using “comfort women” — a Japanese euphemism for thousands of women forced to have sex with Japanese soldiers throughout Asia in the 1930s and 1940s.
Foreign Minister Taro Aso calls the non-bonding resolution “extremely regrettable” and “not based on objective facts.”
The proposed resolution does not seek Japanese reparations, but demands that Japan formally reject revisionists who say sexual enslavement never happened and educate children about the comfort women’s experience. It was unclear when the House subcommittee would meet again to consider whether to endorse the resolution.
Though Japan has admitted to the existence of military-run brothels during WWII, they have rejected most claims for compensation. However an independent, private donation funded Asian Women’s Fund was created by the Japanese government in 1995 for the purpose of providing a means to pay compensation to former comfort women without making official government payments. However, many former comfort women reject this and are demanding official payment from the Japanese government.
Japanese leaders have repeatedly apologized, including former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, who said in 2001 that he felt sincere remorse over the comfort women’s “immeasurable and painful experiences.”
But supporters of the resolution want an apology similar to the one the U.S. government gave to Japanese-Americans forced into internment camps during World War II. That apology was approved by Congress and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1988.
In a letter sent to the congressional panel, Japan’s ambassador to the United States, Ryozo Kato, said his country has recognized its responsibility and acknowledged its actions.
Excuse me, but until I read this report I had a lot of sympathy for the cause of comfort women. But if you look at the site of the Asian Women’s Fund, you will see that it deals with the misdeeds of the Japanese military in a very straightforward manner, admits guilt, and apologizes for it. As reported above, former comfort women are also eligible to receive compensation, which many of them are rejecting. If all of this is true, it would appear that the comfort women organizations are more intent upon embarrassing Japan than in bringing the matter to any type of settlement.
It is the Korean government that put pressure on former comfort women not to receive money from
February 20th, 2007 at 1:17 amthe Asian Women’s Fund. I think they want to keep using this issue politically.
I recommend people to read the following article(though it’s in Korean).
systemclub.co.kr/bbs/zb4pl5/view.php?id=new_jee&no=2061
I’d want a full apology from the most official institutional representative itself… the same one that condoned me to years of sexual abuse… not some small sycophantic off-shoot branch created to save face and give me miserable compensation for a series of horrendous events that I never wanted to participate in in the first place and in which I was a totally innocent civilian victim targetted for continual rape because I was a woman.
It’s a desire for an apology, not an all-you-can-get cash grab.
I say the women deserve it and the Japanese government should cough it up.
February 20th, 2007 at 1:28 amThing is with the US comparison, how many apologies did it make prior to the formal one in 1988? How many apologies has Japan made over the war? It’s too much to expect it to apologise to every single “sub-group” that was wronged.
Plus I think Japan is starting to suffer from “apology-tiredness”. These constant demands for apologies, despite the many statements from government over the whole thing, does irritate many Japanese people, and not just the nationalists.
Also, surely the Korean comfort women were allocated compensation when Japan gave their government all that money. That was government-sourced funds - hardly Tokyo’s fault Seoul spent it on itself!
February 20th, 2007 at 1:38 amOn the other hand, if a formal apology was offered up years ago, like it still should today, this would no longer be an issue and the women would have gone out of the political arena by now.
But if you really want to see it from just the money terms… .
February 20th, 2007 at 4:49 amI’ve found this:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/state9507.html
and this:
http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/pmletter.html
Those both look like apologies to me.
February 20th, 2007 at 5:50 am… an expression of atonement on the part of the Japanese people is not an apology… it’s ‘here’s some money - now the problem can go awaaay.’
“I believe that our country, painfully aware of its moral responsibilities, with feelings of apology and remorse, should face up squarely to its past history and accurately convey it to future generations.” is not an apology. It’s Koizumi saying the country should face up to its past history. Not that is has. And “feelings of apology” isn’t, you know, an apology. It’s like saying ‘with feelings of guilt’ but not ‘I’m guilty’.
It’s the diplomatic equivalent of feel-good fiffle-fuffle to me and if I’d be the one who’s been aggrieved, none of this would wash with me, either.
February 20th, 2007 at 6:14 amBetty Woo, prostitution for military personnel in war zones and occupied territories was widely practiced during war time.
There were “American Military-Base Prostitution”.
http://www.wm.edu/so/monitor/spring2000/paper6.htm
The South Korean army had a comfort woman set up during Korean war.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020226021647/www.asahi.com/national/update/0223/028.html
Comfort women exist in Korea today. In the camp towns outside the US and Korean military bases in Korea. If countries that doesn’t recognize their own wrongdoings constantly try to blame present day Japanese, we have the right to defend us. The sad fact is Koreans don’t really care about other Koreans unless the other Korean happens to have been a victim at the hands of the Japanese. It’s all about Japan.
February 20th, 2007 at 10:29 amWe’re going to have to agree to disagree on this topic, then. I feel secure in my opinion and other people feel secure in theirs.
I’m out on this discussion and on to something new… figuring out t-shirt sayings.
February 20th, 2007 at 11:37 amBetty Woo, an expression of atonement IS an apology, and you’ve essentially proven that there is nothing Japan can do that would make you or the actual comfort women feel any better. They don’t want to get over it. Hating Japan practically keeps them alive.
The time for apologies and guilt is long gone. Korea has no interest in settling the issue. They’ll still whine about it after everyone who was around for World War II is dead.
February 20th, 2007 at 11:39 amLast one (promise). An expression of atonement is NOT an apology - it’s a reparation for a wrong or injury. An apology is ‘I am sorry. I am wrong. I apologize.’
Geeze… you’re all married… haven’t you guys figured that out yet?
February 20th, 2007 at 11:53 amThese demands - especially by countries not directly affected by the specific offenses in question - for a standard of apology that has been met by very few other nations in the world are puzzling to say the least. Let’s be honest here - aside from Germany and the Holocaust, how many cases are there in which traditionally “white” countries have taken steps to apologise (or even make statements of atonement) to victims of their colonial or martial adventures, where such apologies can be helpfully used as models to be followed by Japan in this case? It seems that Japan is being held to a standard that is not for the most part being applied to others. Certainly, it seems odd that the U.S. Congress is getting itself involved in this matter.
February 20th, 2007 at 12:57 pm“US-Japan ties are endagered”? Well, fortunately Japan has numerous other international friends, including…er, Sato-san, have we made that payment to Vanatu yet?
US soldiers would have to place their lives on the line if Japan were attacked. THAT’s why the US Congress is interested in Japan’s massive sex-slavery industry, both WWII-vintage and present-day.
February 20th, 2007 at 2:47 pmThanks for mentioning Vanatu.
I was really having a hard time trying to figure out how to work the following link into a JAPUNDIT article:
Vanuatu’s ‘Cargo Cult’ Celebrates 50 Years of Worshipping U.S.
February 20th, 2007 at 2:56 pmThanks for mentioning Vanatu.
I was really having a hard time trying to figure out how to work the following link into a JAPUNDIT article:
Vanuatu’s ‘Cargo Cult’ Celebrates 50 Years of Worshipping U.S.
February 20th, 2007 at 4:41 pm—–
Savvy John Frum?
Jesus, Betty! Those statements were apologies. Every time I’ve got an “uninterested” friend or relative to look at these sort of comments, they’ve concluded they were apologies. Thus I can only conclude that people who reject them do so because:
a) They’re jaded and suspect everything as being duplicitous.
February 20th, 2007 at 7:42 pmb) They don’t want to accept the Japanese have apologised.
Betty Woo, as long as your own country is almost completely lacking in anything approaching the introspection, candor and remorse you routinely demand of Japan, I will continue to disregard any finger-pointing against the Japanese as the
February 20th, 2007 at 10:35 pmracist double-standard.
Really, everyone. Don’t you think that the term “racist” is used entirely too much these days in cases where it does not apply?
February 20th, 2007 at 10:59 pm“Don’t you think that the term “racist” is used entirely too much these days in cases where it does not apply?”
Yes, and so is the concept of “national character”. There’s no need to point to someone and say: “as long as your own country is COMPLETELY lacking . . . I will continue to disregard . . .”
Come on. We’re adults. We can have a discussion in which we aren’t just token representatives of the countries of our birth and don’t reduce each other to those roles.
For the record, I don’t even know what country Betty Woo is from. The US? China? And Fluffy is from the UK or some part of the Commonwealth? I gotta say, Fluffy, your post was just plain nasty and reveals more about your own stereotypes than anything else.
As for the comfort women–I think being a comfort woman pretty much sets you up for a lifetime of trauma, whether or not, as someone so blithely put it, enforced sexual slavery is just “a part of war.” There’s an interesting movement out now–I think in the Balkans–to try to keep rape out of warfare. Some interesting studies have been done on this, and on the impact that rape during warfare has on the men. I’ll have to look for the link. And as for wartime rape, I personally have no idea how anyone just “gets over it.” It is also a concept which probably affects any woman in a more visceral way than it could any man.
I also suspect that no apology and no amount of money can just “make it go away.” It’s an injustice that is just “there,” for better or for worse. How someone handles this fact is probably a reflection of the individual, of the political environment, access to mental health, etc.
I’ve looked at the links and yes they do look like apologies. There’s one interesting line in Koizumi’s wording:
“Furthermore, Japan also should take an active part in dealing with violence and other forms of injustice to the honor and dignity of women.”
I wonder what “active part” Japan has taken? I’m sure someone out there will know.
February 21st, 2007 at 6:48 am1) What does America care, and why is such an important legislature wasting their time on requesting a symbolic act for something 60 years ago that doesn’t concern them?
2) What is an official apology going to do? Does this bill include some kind of time machine I don’t know about?
3) When does America apologize for contributing to the New World Genocide, the largest in history, which successfully cleared away… oh… 90%+ of the Native population on two continents? And how’s that going to change the mistakes of past generations?
4) When’s America going to apologize for the sex slaves certain units kidnapped from the civilian populations during the Viatnamese war?
It’s one thing to know about the negative aspects of your country’s past (which america sure ignores), but this is going overboard. It’s none of America’s business.
February 21st, 2007 at 12:02 pmthat had a “gasoline-on-the-bonfire” effect (JP)..
Puns zero - Invective ten.

February 21st, 2007 at 12:16 pmI’m intrigued by your rhetorical facility, CAIO, and I’d like to sign up for your newsletter.
February 21st, 2007 at 3:41 pmI believe that one of the main sponsors of the resolution is a Japanese-American man. I can’t find his name right now, but it was in the papers the other day.
February 21st, 2007 at 9:14 pmHere, his name is Honda:
NEWS ITEM: Last month U.S. Rep. Michael Honda [Democrat-California) submitted a House resolution that calls on Tokyo to unambiguously apologize by having the prime minister make a statement…..
February 21st, 2007 at 9:17 pmOne thing that the internet has taught me is that not only is the heavy use of the
emoticon a sigh of a quick wit and a sharp mind, but it’s perhaps, the most indisputable proof of moral righteousness.
I’m afraid I’m going to have to accept defeat in this debate. I just can’t fight
February 23rd, 2007 at 4:58 amLiving in the US, I wasn’t aware of this congregational resolution. Comfort women during the WWII? It seems to me it’s between Japan and China/Korea/Phillipines and wherever, and none of America’s business. How did the US Congress got into this? Could somebody enlighten me?
Just in case someone get on a high moral horse, I’m not arguing either for or against apologizing. That’s not the purpose of this post. I just find it strange that the government I pay my taxes to is putting their nose into yet again somebody else’s business. Not that it’s anything new.
February 28th, 2007 at 8:00 amJust a follow up re: ‘Comfort Women’ Abe denies that the military forced women into sexual slavery… .
March 1, 2007
Japan’s Abe Denies Proof of World War II Sex Slaves
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 2:07 p.m. ET
TOKYO (AP) — Japan’s nationalist prime minister denied Thursday that the country’s military forced women into sexual slavery during World War II, casting doubt on a past government apology and jeopardizing a fragile detente with his Asian neighbors.
The comments by Shinzo Abe, a member of a group of lawmakers pushing to roll back a 1993 apology to the sex slaves, were his clearest statement as prime minister on military brothels known in Japan as ”comfort stations.”
Found at the NYTimes. Someone ought to post the whole article from here:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Japan-Sex-Slaves.html (registration may be required)
It’s an interesting article is provides some background on the circumstances surrounding this topic.
March 2nd, 2007 at 8:23 amAbe sounds scary.
March 2nd, 2007 at 8:32 amLet’s assume for a moment that the substance of Abe’s statement, if construed narrowly, is true. It’s still a spectacularly stupid and unnecessary comment to make in light of the foreseeable diplomatic repercussions and the absence of any real gains, political or otherwise.
March 2nd, 2007 at 8:47 amCat. Pigeons. Mayhem.
March 2nd, 2007 at 9:01 am[...] Now, I usually like what JP over at Japundit says, but I have to say, I was a bit surprised to hear this during his last podcast (which, as I’ve pointed out, are outstanding—join in now if you haven’t already): Excuse me, but until I read this report I had a lot of sympathy for the cause of comfort women. But if you look at the site of the Asian Women’s Fund, you will see that it deals with the misdeeds of the Japanese military in a very straightforward manner, admits guilt, and apologizes for it. As reported above, former comfort women are also eligible to receive compensation, which many of them are rejecting. If all of this is true, it would appear that the comfort women organizations are more intent upon embarrassing Japan than in bringing the matter to any type of settlement. [...]
March 2nd, 2007 at 10:02 amBetty Woo — I have a post on this coming up . . . and I implored you to come back and post! But you beat me to it. Nice to see you.
March 2nd, 2007 at 10:45 amI was hoping the news report about Abe’s comments would pass by without anyone noticing, but…. (Just kidding!)
You really have to wonder just what in the heck it is they are trying to accomplish with this.
March 2nd, 2007 at 11:21 amYeah… I just can’t for the life of me understand how Abe could have stumbled so badly into this whole issue unless it was to appease… idiots?
What I’d *love* to see is a reporter now go back to Hakuo Yanagisawa, the supremely mechanically-minded Health & Welfare Minister, and see how he handles this… “but they *wanted* to be good baby-making machines!”
Grab the popcorn, kids, and settle in - the fireworks will be spectacular (I hope).
March 2nd, 2007 at 11:40 amHe’s got Roh of Korea coming at him from one side a couple of days ago, and then there’s Mr Honda on the other side. And rather than do the statesmanly thing and actually address the issue, seems he’s more concerned with losing face. And seems he might actually be paying attention to those popularity polls and wrong-headedly believes that this is showing leadership skills.
March 2nd, 2007 at 1:10 pmI’m grabbing at straws but I just can’t imagine why else he’d choose to spout this errant nonsense, particularly at this time.
[...] After singing the praises of the Asian Women’s Fund here and their efforts to resolve the comfort women issue, we are now nonplussed to find out that the fund is to be disbanded. [...]
March 9th, 2007 at 2:00 pm[...] Japundit: Comfort women discomfort [...]
March 20th, 2007 at 2:30 am[...] accurate could have severe consequences in the world of American politics which respect to how they deal with the issue. Not to mention the fact that American GI’s would be guilty of rape and soliciting [...]
April 27th, 2007 at 4:00 am[...] Honda, who is sponsor of the resolution telling Japan to apologize formally for the “comfort woman” brothels its military set up during WWII now is asking the [...]
May 5th, 2007 at 12:00 pm