Japan a bunch of sore losers?
Caught an excellent letter to the editor a reader named Robbie A. Cabrera in The Daily Yomiuri this morning (no net link available at the time of this writing) that perfectly expresses many of the same feelings I have about Japanese athletes who participate in international sports competitions. Titled “Japanese athletes need to learn the art of losing,” the letter criticizes the recent reaction to woman wrestler Kyoko Hamaguchi’s loss at the world wrestling championships (which is not an isolated incident for her) for “the misguided idea that Japan should have some automatic right to win a medal.”
Cabrera is right on the money as he describes the problem and what Japan needs to do to resolve it:
[S]upporters sometimes get out of control – partly because they are not used to accepting defeat. And some of today’s Japanese athletes are just as bad, being unable to accept defeat, and behaving as if they always expect to win. When defeated, all kinds of accusations, complaints and excuses are fabricated to try to explain the loss away, or in an attempt to manipulate the game and the officials. That is wrong, and the worst thing to do in the event of defeat.
Crying does not help either. It never gains sympathy – it only shows how weak you are. But Japanese surely are world leaders at crying publicly in an attempt to gain sympathy.
Nor does it help when officials pander to this kind of behavior. After Hamaguchi’s defeat, Japan Wrestling President Tomiaki Fukuda said, “Japanese women wrestlers are being targeted” – a comment that proves he does not deserve to lead this venerable organization. Fukuda should not take sides and make accusations about the judging. Teams may protest – that’s their right – but when videos are reviewed and the ruling is satisfactorily approved, you should shut up and comply with the decision as it stands.
My point is this: never take part in any competition if you have this kind of attitude. To all Japanese sportsmen and sportswomen, give up the public crying, win or lose. Show the world you are the best by accepting defeats with grace. In short, be sporting, because that’s what sport is all about.
Amen, Robbie.
Though certainly not a universal vice among Japanese athletes, the recent world Judo tournament brought out a number of prominent poor sports.
I suppose part of it may be due to the pressure of the medal-mania the Japanese media seem to fall into whenever Japan is participating in an international venue. It’s like no medal and you shame Japan.
Ironic considering Japan is traditionally noted for the sports tradition of athletes from sumo to go being expected to take both victory and defeat stoically.
September 26th, 2007 at 6:29 pm“Ironic considering Japan is traditionally noted for the sports tradition of athletes from sumo to go being expected to take both victory and defeat stoically.”
I call it a “westernization” of Japan
September 26th, 2007 at 6:55 pmI call it a “westernization” of Japan
I call that a bit harsh. Seems a way to duck responsibility for the fact.
September 26th, 2007 at 7:59 pmFor what I’m aware and I say this without even really having a REAL clue about it, the Japanese life is hard, so everything is about honor. If you win, you gain honor, If you lose, you lose honor, isn’t that something that has to do with it? I’m not sure tough.
I do know that the Japanese people are one of the cheeriest supporters ever.
Besides I think there are more countries that act like that after they lose. You should see them hooligans in England or Holland after a club loses a match, that’s even worse than in Japan. Hope Japan doesn’t get WESTERNIZED too much btw. :S
September 26th, 2007 at 8:01 pmAt the news I heard the game was unlucky for Kyoko Hamaguchi because the referee didn’t review the video. ( After the game the supervisor admitted the judgment had been a mistake. ) Because Japan Woman Wrestling team is strong (as exceptional as Judo), it’s sometimes hard for them to accept defeat. Also Kyoko and her passionate father Animal Hamaguchi pair is famous for such ” crying and exciting ” emotional temperament in the competition. You can’t generalize it for most athletes in Japan.
I think there are apparently two different factors involved about the incident of sports competition. The first one is of course the attitude of the athlete about the judgment and the result. The second one is the nationalism of the media (and supporters). In any country this can be quite ludicrous from the third observer point of view. I assume that sports ado is quite a universal phenomenon. You can give thousands of examples.
But as this post suggests Japanese people have difficulties in controlling their emotions in severe situations. You see those scenes here and there. I’m sometimes Upset about that. ( Sigh.)
September 26th, 2007 at 8:13 pmI think the author of that letter is also complaining about how most Japanese athletes (male and female) these days seem to cry all the time. They win, they cry. They lose, they cry. Not just a few tears either.
September 26th, 2007 at 9:58 pmNot all Japanese athletes act like the Hamaguchi family and I don’t think that was the point of the letter. However, I do think that there is a lot a blame gaming and finger pointing when Japanese athletes do not emerge victorious in certain events they are expected to win.
Often the reasons cited for poor performances by favorite athletes or teams are: the size of the opponents, extreme heat (ignoring the fact that all the competitors have to endure the same), injury, poor officiating, bias, etc.
During the recent athletics competitions in Osaka, the poor showings of certain Japanese athletes who, it had been reported, were sure to win medals, were explained away as being due to training schedules that are finely tuned to peak (and achieve certain victory) in Beijing next year. . . As if none of the other competitors or nations who showed up at Osaka are giving any thought at all to the Olympics.
September 26th, 2007 at 10:22 pmIt’s not just sports. I have heard some bizarre claims issued in Japan to defend poor performance in a number of fields, commercial and political, even resorting to racism and sexism or bizarre conspiracy theories. It’s a sheer inability to take something on the chin and learn from the mistake.
September 26th, 2007 at 11:40 pm[...] Japan a bunch of sore losers? [...]
September 27th, 2007 at 2:25 amAh… flashback to Japan’s woes during FIFA: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/sp20060625mm.html
September 27th, 2007 at 4:57 amTo call it the “Westernisation of Japan” is to not be specific enough.
The British countries always had the tradition of “Play the game for the games sake, be a good sport”. In my childhood, if one single spectator in the school crowd booed anyone on the field, called abuse at the coach, or any other example of bad sportsmanship, all hell would break loose. The ref, and BOTH the coaches, would make a point of having that person evicted from the field, and what is more, both teams would feel that their honour had been damaged.
Fights happened, but you could be perfectly sure that your own team-mates would stop you, and be angry with you for being a bad sport.
At the level of adult sport, it was simply unthinkable, unheard of, for someone to boo from a crowd.
At the national level, if someone was to be a bad sport on the field, and this covered egotistic self lauding crap as much as attacks of the opponent, they would kiss good bye to their position representing our country.
I lived in Papaua New Guinea, Australia, Fiji, and Samoa, and exacly the same ideal was held to.
Until the generation that was born in the 60s came of age to play sport. The generation that had been educated through increased exposure through television on the “American virtues” of egotism, partisan support of TEAMS instead of SPORTS, winning at any cost, the self instead of the team, “If you don’t win you are nothing”, Performance Enhancing, and all the rest. The generation that had coaches who had been to America to learn how “The big boys” approached sport.
It isn’t the westernisation of sport at all. The fault comes from one place.
September 27th, 2007 at 7:28 amTigger,
Your generalization is just as bogus as the one to which you are responding.
First, until the 60’s the team play spirit you describe was just as strong in the U.S. as it was in the rest of the world.
Second, I don’t think any players and coaches in the countries you mentioned were forced to change their ways. They did so at their own discretion. Because of this responsibility for the consequences of their actions lies solely with them and not with some irresistible dark force from across the sea.
September 27th, 2007 at 10:13 amI must echo Tigger’s remarks. The fault indeed seems to be rooted in one country, the very same country that has held the most powerful sway over Japan for the last 60-odd years.
Even my beloved ice hockey, which was once played by amatuers and pros alike for the sheer love of the game has been tarnished by administrative and financial domination of one country, and expansion into lucrative markets in the South of said country, rather than focusing on the base in the North.
September 27th, 2007 at 10:14 amJP does make a good point, that the ultimate responsibility lies with those who accept the idea that winning at all costs and all the time is somehow integral to national identity.
The race for ideological and military superiority between world superpowers spilled over into sports, and quickly came to dominate.
September 27th, 2007 at 10:20 amActually, Mike, that is precisely the reason I dislike any sporting event that pits one country against another.
September 27th, 2007 at 11:21 amI hear ya, JP. Sad it had come to that, eh.
I don’t even enjoy watching much pro sports of any type these days. It’s one thing to give notice to your opponent, but it’s quite another all the displays we see out there now. All the celebrating we see after one basket or one touchdown or one QB sack. Each and every minor individual accomplishment in each and every game must be punctuated with a finger pointing, a little dance, fist/arm pumping, guts poses, and all sorts of jumping, shouting, and back-slapping. Just get the game on, and celebrate if and when you win. Show a little respect for the other guy/team/the fans. Now it’s all me! me! me!
September 27th, 2007 at 11:55 amSorry causing trouble. Actually my comment was intended as a satirical joke, but I couldn’t find the smile mark.
But anyway, although I agree to some degree with the Daily Yomiuri article, I don’t like the over categorizing simplistic tone or comments as if it is a Japan proper problems or a problem of the Japanese people.
If such over categorizing and simplistic tone is legitimate, I don’t know why over categorizing the whole influence to Japanese sport industry (commercialism, professionalism, concept of fair play etc) as “western” should be allowed (“sports” itself is a western concept). Thus a (failed) satirical comment.
I think that all comments, be it by experts (Japanese and non-Japanese included) or amateurs, who try to explain sports with national characters or nationality is bogus.
The “Japanese” have to learn fair play, they don’t know it + “tradidionaly” they supposed to learn how to be humble and be a good looser in Sumo ( who believes that today?) = it must be “western” influence that the “Japanese” today don’t know how to accept defeat, all is bogus.
September 27th, 2007 at 1:05 pmJP.
You are not speaking accurately, when you say my comment is as bogus as the initial one. My comment may not have gone further (or far enough, in your opinion) along the line than pointing out where the fault originated, that is true enough. That doesn’t detract from its perfect accuracy as far as it went.
And while we do have some share of the blame because we took up the “Win at all cost” philosophy, it was actively touted out to the world, by self confident, self promoting “Coach coaches”, books, television, the “whole nine yards” to use the apt term. And these coachings were not couched in British accents.
And yes, I do understand that America is greater than the whitening polish on the teeth of the people running the game. I do understand that they are as badly served by the whole egotism creed as we whom have had it shoved down our throats by the most powerful economy in the world, looking for markets. I just don’t think my sympathy for the good in America (Which far outweighs the bad, of course) needs mean I stay silent for the bad.
You are right too, that these were never dominant traits in the US personality.
Tiger Woods is a most worthy sportsman, intelligent, disciplined, dedicated, anyone would be proud that the man represented their country. He obviously is one of the greats. What possible need does the man have to clench his fist, bare his teeth, and snarl at the camera when he wins, to unbegrudged admiration from one and all?. Jack Nicolas never did anything so repulsive.And seriously, that Tiger ever did so even once, without the instant censure of his peers, the sports organisation and most importantly, his fans, is absolute proof that the centre of the whole ideal is rotten.
Who is he snarling at?. Everyone admires him. It is the American Sportsmans “Way” now. And never was the Japanese way, nor the Kiwi way.
More fools us, you say, and yes, you are right. This absolves others of their own guilt?.
September 27th, 2007 at 2:06 pmYou are not speaking accurately, when you say my comment is as bogus as the initial one.
Oh, I don’t know. . . Saying something like, “We all are now such poor sports – And it’s all your fault!” sounds pretty bogus to me no matter who the “we” and the “you” are.
As I said: Fair play, team play, good sportsmanship, how you play the game, and all of that was very much part of the U.S. culture as well up until around the 1960’s. I can attest to this with confidence because that was the culture in which I grew up.
What possible need does [Tiger Woods] have to clench his fist, bare his teeth, and snarl at the camera when he wins, to unbegrudged admiration from one and all? Jack Nicolas never did anything so repulsive.
I totally agree. And as my golf buddy, Mr. Pink, will attest, I also find such behavior repulsive. The people cheering such behavior do not represent me.
September 27th, 2007 at 4:36 pmNow, now JP. You have to understand that Tigger hails from a kinder, gentler sporting tradition, one that would never for a second countenance anything so crass as to (just for an example) insult and attempt to intimidate a rival team with some half-assed imitation of a native warrior dance. Never happen.
September 27th, 2007 at 6:04 pmTo say nothing of those amazingly reserved fans at the old Montreal Forum back in the days of Rocket Richard. I was indeed touched at the consideration they gave visiting teams.
The world has changed folks. Sports are no longer the province of elites and their usage of manners to keep out the masses and corrupting money (they didn’t need it). If anything has changed the game, it’s not one country or any country’s culture. It’s the expanded player base, the influx of massive amounts of money and the changing nature of media (i.e., internet, 24/7 specialized tv channels).
Or you could blame the generation that grew up in the mid 60s across the world and rejected authority and greater good while embracing exploration of themselves (i.e., ‘me’). They taught their kids the same lessons. This has evolved in unexpected ways in society/culture and is also displayed in sports.
September 27th, 2007 at 11:06 pmPersonally, the grandstanding doesn’t bother me. Trash-talking is another thing. It’s rather pathetic that this sort of behaviour played such a prominent role in the last World Cup. In any case, my disillusionment with professional sports can be traced back to the 1994 World Series. Anyone remember who won that year?
September 28th, 2007 at 12:58 am‘Twas the year the Jays had their two year streak beaten, yes? Wasn’t the season marred by a strike?
September 28th, 2007 at 2:09 amExactly. In other words, there was no WS winner that year. As a fan, I could conceive of nothing more that could have been done to make it clear that neither management nor players respected the game.
September 28th, 2007 at 2:19 amI think RTN called it.
Additionally, throughout history, people in a culture generally tried to imitate the top tier of that culture, by copying their manners, dress, etc. So even the poorest could demonstrate some refinement.
Now, it’s the other way round. Even the upper classes want to imitate the lowest rung of society. So the manners are crass and the trousers hang below the waist. The latter trend started in prisons before spreading to the wider world. That says it all.
Spectator sports are a complete waste of time anyway, like TV dramas and wanking. Sure they have their place, since we all need our mindless pleasures - but who can get pleasure from watching the current crop of ingrates?
September 28th, 2007 at 8:08 amI also agree with you, ghoti, about RTN calling it. I also like your observation that, “Now, it’s the other way round. Even the upper classes want to imitate the lowest rung of society.”
September 28th, 2007 at 10:20 amCheeseWhiz, I didn’t realize everyone was a Mr. Pink wannabe! Wish I could set you all a better example.
September 28th, 2007 at 11:05 amSome very interesting insights into the situation. But, is there any hope for the future of sports? Or, do you foresee an ever spiraling mire of greed and crassness?
September 28th, 2007 at 1:03 pmMr Pink, the Haka is a very specific thing, and you don’t understand the intent with which it is made, I am afraid. If they wanted to INSULT a team, they would not do a Haka, they would all turn their backs, and drop their trousers enough to reveal one buttock, which they would slap.
The Haka is done to offer respect to the team they will face. The thinking goes something like this. “We are going to fight you now. We are hard men, WORTH fighting, see our Haka. We promise to beat you, make your promise back to us”.
If you were NOT worth fighting, you sure wouldn’t be worthy of recieving a Haka.
Ever seen the All Blacks face Manu Samoa?. Tonga?. Fiji?, Papaua New Guinea?. Notice how both teams stand respectfully, manfully, and watch the others Haka?. See any idea in anyones face that an insult is being offered?.
And if you think the Haka is half-arsed, or not meant fully as I have explained, isn’t that proof that YOU lack comprehension, rather than my country lacking anything?.
I completely disagree that there was anything like following the “Top Tier” of society.
You guys have little faith in the intelligence of people if you think they would follow a mode of behaviour that had no reward. People played the game as sportsmen previously, because it was rewarding to be considered a “good sport”, not because they thought they might get mistaken for Rupert Chomodly-Walker from Eton.
Just as, when the meme was exported from the USA that “Winning is all that matters”, they didn’t think they might get mistaken for an American, people brought into it, they followed that mode of behaviour, because it was REWARDING, no-one punished them for being bad sports (Or too few people offered too little disapproval to be effective) and people (spectators, coaches, parents) who brought into the new idea, REWARDED the players for their bad sportsmanship.
In the end, it is only a way of thinking, I am sure neither way is “Moral” with a capital M, not some absolute. But again, that isn’t to say that this “new way” can not be traced back to a specific place.
It wasn’t “The West” that made the Japanese sports people consider a “loss” as worth shame, or tears.
September 28th, 2007 at 3:53 pmI see, I see. If I don’t accept everything you say at face value, that’s proof I’m an idiot. Sure! I can’t imagine why I didn’t realize that from the go. I simply lack comprehension!
September 28th, 2007 at 6:16 pmAs one who has actually stripped down and done the Haka with the All Blacks (possibly under threat of violence, though I was too drunk to remember), I will say that it has as little to do with this thread as do your “America is the evil ruler of the world” ramblings, Tigger. Really, it’s tiresome. Are we to believe that the rest of the world is filled with namby-pamby sheep that cannot help but imitate what they see as being “American?” I really wish you people would find something else to obsess over. It’s a joke when Canadians, Brits, Kiwis, whatever, spend more time talking (if ignorant ranting qualifies as talking) about the American medical system than they do their own, for example.
Getting hard to have a frigging conversation around here…..
September 28th, 2007 at 8:44 pmEndless references to the U.S. do grate after a while.
There are those who wish to throw criticism, to whom I say there are other places online better suited.
But equally tiresome are the frequent assumptions of others that all here (and on other English-language Japan sites) have a frame of reference limited to (or even including) the U.S.
I wanna talk about Japan.
September 28th, 2007 at 9:35 pmI think that overoften sums it all up quite nicely.
Let’s get the discussion back to Japan.
September 28th, 2007 at 11:28 pm